sebuah coretan,catatan kecil dari tanah argopuro

15 April 2009

Design For Six Sigma Is Changing How Businesses Operate

By Craig Calvin

DFSS, which stands for Design for Six Sigma is a distinct and rapidly growing business-development managing tactic that is linked to conventional Six Sigma procedures. Instruments and arrangements employed in Six Sigma need a procedure to be organized and performing, while in DFSS, you deal with the purpose of finding out the clients or business requirements, and marry the same into the solution you develop. DFSS is pertinent to the complicated arrangement of the product development stage, particularly in relation to exceptional or first time making of the same. It talks about procedure creation as opposed to procedure enhancement.

Other terms associated with Six Sigma are DMADV which stands for Define, Measure, Analyze, Design and Verify of existing procedures, and also DMAIC which stands for Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control of existing procedures. Both of these stress enhancement of existing production and generally occur after initial production has commenced.

DFSS is different from other procedures in that it is implemented at the beginning of the production process rather than later. By being the initial architect and engineer of the business processes from the onset, it allows the business the structure it needs to grow right from the beginning. The resulting solutions will offer the client better production and general business experiences.

Initially DFSS was made partly as Six Sigma companies realized that optimization of a product or products was almost impossible over three or four Sigma if they did not totally recreate the same in a new way, which means that Six Sigma grades of functioning have to be built-in or have to be present in the design of the product itself. While one can assert that DFSS and DMAIC are more or less similar processes, in reality, the working way varies as DFSS needs diverse sets of tools to carry out its system design functions. DMAIC Six Sigma might be even now, be in use for scrutiny of system architecture and "back end" Six Sigma procedures, while DFSS offers system design procedures utilized in front-end complicated system plans.

Primarily, the difference in DMAIC and DFSS is that DMAIC is useful in refining what already is in existence. DFSS is there at the beginning, and through interviews and analysis of feedback from clients, new procedures are designed and implemented from the beginning of the production process.

About the Author:

Tidak ada komentar: